Author: Donald Doherty

  • Alzheimer’s Disease and the New Age-Based Hypothesis

    A new review of processes underlying Alzheimer’s disease by Dr. Karl Herrup presents a new synthesis and framework to view this debilitating illness. The current standard view of the cause of Alzheimer’s disease is known as the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis. The existence of amyloid beta plaques in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease patients lead to the idea that the plaques may be the cause of the disease (see my earlier blog post “Wrong Idea for Cause of Alzheimer’s Disease?“).

    The review paper titled “Reimagining Alzheimer’s Disease—An Age-Based Hypothesis” by Karl Herrup was published December 15, 2010 in the Journal of Neuroscience.

    Figure 1. A diagram showing processes underlying the age-based hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease. See the blog post text for further explanation. From “Reimagining Alzheimer’s Disease—An Age-Based Hypothesis“. By Karl Herrup. The Journal of Neuroscience Volume 30, Number 50, December 15, 2010.

    Dr. Herrup presents a compelling argument for an Age-Based Hypothesis to explain the cause of Alzheimer’s disease. This hypothesis takes into account a lot of new data that the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis does not. In addition, the amyloid deposition cycle is taken into account and fits in naturally within the larger framework of the Age-Based Hypothesis.

    Age, of course, is considered a fundamental factor in the Age-Based Hypothesis. You may break your hip at any age but as you age a broken hip is made more likely (due to poor balance at an advanced age, for instance) and more serious because of age related changes in the healing power of the body among other factors. The brain in the aged is different in many ways from the youthful brain. The Age-Based Hypothesis states that, given an elderly brain, the process leading to the expression of Alzheimer’s disease follows three important steps. Each step is highlighted in a light blue bubble in Figure 1 (above) and sequentially numbered in purple.

    First an initiating injury transforms an elderly brain into an elderly brain on a trajectory towards expressing Alzheimer’s disease. The injury could be anything from a serious bump on the head to a highly traumatic event such as the loss of a spouse. The initiating injury leads to the second step which is chronic nervous tissue inflammation. This is where the Age-Based Hypothesis encompasses amyloid beta deposition since inflammation of brain tissue activates the amyloid deposition cycle. In the third step, the chronically inflamed brain tissue moves into a new state (change-of-state) that may kick off any of several intracellular molecular cascades that lead to synaptic dysfunction and neuronal death. It’s synaptic dysfunction and neuronal death that result in dementia.

    The Age-Based Hypothesis makes a lot of sense and may lead to new insights including new ways of treating the disease. There may be many changes to this hypothesis over the coming months and years but I think it’ll prove to be a productive hypothesis.

    Other related blog posts:

    Wrong Idea for Cause of Alzheimer’s Disease?

    Brain Research Using Online Data Repositories: Whole Genome and Whole Brain Search for Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers

  • Dynamical Systems Activity in the Brain Initiates and Executes Movement

    Our brains become active while we prepare to move and they continue to generate electrical signals as those movements are carried out. Signals associated with movements are generated in the motor cortex. A standard assumption has been that signals associated with preparations for a movement are subthreshold forms of the same neural signals associated with the execution of the movement. A new paper titled “Cortical Preparatory Activity: Representation of Movement or First Cog in a Dynamical Machine?” (published November 4, 2010 in Neuron) challenges this assumption.

    A key test of the assumption that preparatory activity constitutes a subthreshold precursor of movement activity is that the two should share similar tuning to the preferred direction of movement. The data show that the majority of the time this isn’t the case. Most of the time preparatory activity is tuned to a significantly different preferred direction than the movement activity.

    What is the nature of signal processing during the preparatory and movement phases of motor activity? How are they related? The authors argue that “preparatory activity exists not to represent specific movement features but to initialize a dynamical system whose evolution will produce perimovement activity.”

    Note: Perimovement activity is the neural activity occurring at the same time that the movement is being carried out.

    We took a peak at how the dynamical systems approach may help us understand signal processing in a single neuron in my earlier blog post “Dynamical Systems and Silicon Based Hybrid Spiking Neurons.” In today’s paper, the conclusion is intriguing but left me wondering exactly how dynamical systems may illuminate signal processing in the motor cortex.

    Other related blog posts:

    Dynamical Systems and Silicon Based Hybrid Spiking Neurons

  • Google Body Browser: Information Portal for the Human Body?

    Google has released the Google Body Browser to Google Labs. Google Body Browser is implemented using WebGL, which enables the display and interaction with three-dimensional (3D) graphics that are fully integrated with Web browsers. WebGL is the Web version of the 3D graphics standard OpenGL and is displayed by the HTML5 canvas element.

    Figure 1. View the circulatory and central nervous systems in Google Body Browser using Google Chrome beta.

    I believe that the Google Chrome beta is currently the only browser that implements WebGL but the other browsers are certain to follow Google’s lead. High quality 3D graphics display has been the last great hurdle to providing visually compelling Web browser based applications. With WebGL expect the floodgates to amazing new Web-based applications to open.

    Figure 2. View the central nervous system in Google Body Browser using Google Chrome beta.

    The upper left part of the Google Body Browser window has a tool area. The complete body is initially shown by default. In addition, you may select from five systems including the muscular, skeletal, internal organ, circulatory, and central nervous systems.

    In the tool area, if the vertical “pill” below the brain and to the left is selected, then you may move the horizontal bar up (top complete human body) and down (bottom nervous system and very bottom nothing). See Figure 2 for an example showing just the central nervous system.

    In the tool area, if the vertical “pill” below the brain and to the right is selected, then you may move each of six vertical bars right and left. When a bar is all the way left, the associated system is completely transparent (it doesn’t show). As you move the bar right, the system fades in. This enables you to look at more than one system at the same time. See Figure 1 for an example showing the circulatory and central nervous systems.

    Wow! Great tool and, even though the only thing currently attached are labels, it’s clear that all sorts of data may be associated with the structures displayed in the Google Body Browser including the data we found associated with the brain in the Whole Brain Catalog (see my blog post Whole Brain Catalog: the Google Earth for the Brain). Looks like the Google Body Browser will be the portal for life sciences and medical data.

    Other related blog posts:

    Whole Brain Catalog: the Google Earth for the Brain